王朝网络
分享
 
 
 

Constitutionalism and Legal Reasoning立宪与法律推理

王朝导购·作者佚名
 
Constitutionalism and Legal Reasoning立宪与法律推理  点此进入淘宝搜索页搜索
  特别声明:本站仅为商品信息简介,并不出售商品,您可点击文中链接进入淘宝网搜索页搜索该商品,有任何问题请与具体淘宝商家联系。
  参考价格: 点此进入淘宝搜索页搜索
  分类: 图书,进口原版书,人文社科 Non Fiction ,

作者: Massimo La Torre著

出 版 社: 化学工业出版社

出版时间: 2007-4-1字数:版次: 1页数: 185印刷时间: 2007/04/01开本: 16开印次: 1纸张: 胶版纸I S B N : 9781402055942包装: 精装内容简介

This is a search of a model for a humane law - where the cruelty ban is still in force. This book however is not intended as an utopian enterprise; the humane law which is looked for is not for the future, nor is it meant as a reform project, or as a programme for new institutions to come. Here the contention is that positive law is better understood, if it is not too easily equated with power, force, or command. Law - it is shown - is more a matter of discourse and deliberation, than of sheer decision or of power relations. Constitutionalism, legal argumentation, legal ethics - three fundamental moments of our daily experience with the law - are there to witness that this view may be right. Now a "constitutional" view of the law and its practice and the connected discoursive approach to legal reasoning can offer interesting solutions also to legal ethics. If we take legal reasoning seriously, and conceive it in a "liberal" way comprising both lawyers and judges, so that adjudication is both a task for advocates and judges, the requirement of separation of powers on the one side is already full of implications for lawyers' deontology: the role of a lawyer will not be allowed to encroach with the one fulfilled by the statesman. On the other side, the claim of rightness intrinsic in legal discourse cannot avoided by lawyers. So that they could no longer be seen as defenders of clients' interests, but of their rights. And rights are claims to be right. Thus the requirement of justice, or better a certain threshold imposed on the tolerable injustice of the legal claim raised, will be inescapable not only for the judge, but to the lawyer as well. The general idea of this book may unfortunately run counter recent developments in the international arena and more generally in the less palpable Zeitgeist. It might well be that, like Hegel's owl that takes flight at sunset, a conceptual pattern is set forth while the corresponding institutional practice is beginning to die out.

目录

Preface.

Chapter I: Law as Constitution

1. Rhetoric and Practical Reason

1.1. Two Paradigms of Right Reasoning

1.2. From Fundamental Law to Social Contract and Self-Institution

1.3. Modern Constitutionalism

2. Constitutionalism and Legal Positivism

2.1. Law as Fact

2.2. Legislation and Sovereignty

2.3. The Raise of German Public Law

2.4. Legal Positivism and Constitutionalism

3. From State Law to Constitutional State, or, from Herrschaft to "Discourse"

3.1. Normativity and Facticity

3.2. Normativism, Institutionalism, Decisionism

3.3. "Wille zur Verfassung", Will of Constitution

Chapter II: Legal Argumentation and Concepts of Law

1. Rhetoric and Practical Reason

1.1. Two Paradigms of Right Reasoning

1.2. Theoretical Versus Practical Rationalit

2. Legal Reasoning Redeemed

2.1. Rehabilitation of Practical Reason: the Topic

2.2. The "New Rhetoric" School

2.3. Philosophical Hermeneutics

3.Contemporary Doctrines

3.1. Neil MacCormick’s Formalist Model

3.2. Ronald Dworkin’s Interpretive Turn

3.3. Discourse Theory

4. Law as Discourse and Constitution

4.1. Morality Reconnected to Law

4.2. A New Model of Democrac

Chapter III: The Practice of Law and Legal Ethics

1. "Jurists, bad Christians"

1.1. Lawyers According to the Tradition

1.2. The Legal Positivist Myth

1.3. Plato, Kant and Modern Jurisprudence

2. Ambiguity of Deontological Rules

2.1. Deontological Codes

2.2. Civil law and Common Law

3. Two Opposed Paradigms

3.1. The Legalistic Approach

3.2. The Moralistic Approach

4. Legal Ethics and the Concept of Law

4.1. The "Moral Amorality" Thesis

4.2. The "Full Morality" Thesis

4.3. A Pragmatist Alternative and the Radbruch Formula

Epilogue.

Appendix A: Natural Law: "Exclusive" Versus "Inclusive"

Appendix B: Robert Alexy's Constitutional Rights Theory

Author Index

Subject Index

 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
2023年上半年GDP全球前十五强
 百态   2023-10-24
美众议院议长启动对拜登的弹劾调查
 百态   2023-09-13
上海、济南、武汉等多地出现不明坠落物
 探索   2023-09-06
印度或要将国名改为“巴拉特”
 百态   2023-09-06
男子为女友送行,买票不登机被捕
 百态   2023-08-20
手机地震预警功能怎么开?
 干货   2023-08-06
女子4年卖2套房花700多万做美容:不但没变美脸,面部还出现变形
 百态   2023-08-04
住户一楼被水淹 还冲来8头猪
 百态   2023-07-31
女子体内爬出大量瓜子状活虫
 百态   2023-07-25
地球连续35年收到神秘规律性信号,网友:不要回答!
 探索   2023-07-21
全球镓价格本周大涨27%
 探索   2023-07-09
钱都流向了那些不缺钱的人,苦都留给了能吃苦的人
 探索   2023-07-02
倩女手游刀客魅者强控制(强混乱强眩晕强睡眠)和对应控制抗性的关系
 百态   2020-08-20
美国5月9日最新疫情:美国确诊人数突破131万
 百态   2020-05-09
荷兰政府宣布将集体辞职
 干货   2020-04-30
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案逍遥观:鹏程万里
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案神机营:射石饮羽
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案昆仑山:拔刀相助
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案天工阁:鬼斧神工
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案丝路古道:单枪匹马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:与虎谋皮
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:李代桃僵
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:指鹿为马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:小鸟依人
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:千金买邻
 干货   2019-11-12
 
>>返回首页<<
推荐阅读
 
 
频道精选
 
更多商品
Matrix metalloproteinases in the central nervous system中枢神经系统中的基质金属蛋白酶
Elements of abstract analysis抽象分析原理
Counterdeception Principles and Applications for National Security抗欺骗原理与国家安全应用
Sustainable Practice for the Facilities Manager后勤管理员可持续实践
Knowledge Management in Construction建筑知识管理
Lectures on morse homology莫尔斯同源演讲
P-adic deterministic and random dynamicsP-adic确定性及随机动态
The Genius of Euler欧拉的天赋
From Calculus to Computers: Using the Last 200 Years of Mathematics History in the Classroom从计算到计算机
Binomial distribution handbook for scientists and engineers科学家和工程师用二项分布手册
静静地坐在废墟上,四周的荒凉一望无际,忽然觉得,凄凉也很美
© 2005- 王朝网络 版权所有