本篇RFC主要的是对于RFC687进行似乎有道理的改动的意见集合,同时也可以作为对 RFC690的注释。 现在的主要的问题,就好象Postel所指出的那样,在于改动后的IMP和HOST传输的前 导
本篇RFC主要的是对于RFC687进行似乎有道理的改动的意见集合,同时也可以作为对 RFC690的注释。 现在的主要的问题,就好象Postel所指出的那样,在于改动后的IMP和HOST传输的前 导字符
Network Working Group John M. McQuillan Request for Comments #394 Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc. NIC
Network Working Group A. McKenzie RFC#312 BBN NIC 9342 22 March 1972 Categories: B.1 Proposed Cha
Network Working Group S. Crocker Request for Comments #66 UCLA 26 August 70 3rd Level Ideas and
Network Working Group Stephen Wolfe RFC# 692 UCLA CCN NIC # 32734 June 20, 1975 COMMENTS ON IMP/H
Network Working Group Paul J. Santos, Jr. (BBN) Request for Comments 704 Sept 1975 NIC #33490 IMP
Network Working Group Jon Postel RFC# 690 USC-ISI NIC # 32699 June 6, 1975 Comments on the propos
Network Working Group B. Cosell Request for Comments: 209 Bolt Beranek and Newman NIC: 7187 13 Aug
Network Working Group D. Walden (BBN-NET) Request for Comments: 660 Oct 1974 NIC #31202 SOME CHAN