王朝网络

分享

 

01.RFC747 - Recent extensions to the SUPDUP Protocol
NWG/RFC# 747 MRC 21-MAR-78 44015Recent Extensions to the SUPDUP ProtocolNetwork Working Group Mark CrispinRequest for Comments 747 SU-AINIC 44015 21 March 1978Updates: RFC734. See also RFC746. Rec...查看完整版>>RFC747 - Recent extensions to the SUPDUP Protocol02.RFC1229 - Extensions to the generic-interface MIB
Network Working Group K. McCloghrie, EditorRequest for Comments: 1229 Hughes LAN Systems, Inc. May 1991 Extensions to the Generic-Interface MIBStatus of this Memo This RFCcontains definitions of m...查看完整版>>RFC1229 - Extensions to the generic-interface MIB03.RFC614 - Response to RFC607: Comments on the File Transfer Protocol
Network Working Group K. Pogran (MIT-Multics)Request for Comments: 614 N. Neigus (BBN-NET)NIC #21530 Jan 1974References: RFC#607, RFC#542 Response to RFC607, "Comments on the File Transfer Protoco...查看完整版>>RFC614 - Response to RFC607: Comments on the File Transfer Protocol04.RFC1513 - Token Ring Extensions to the Remote Network Monitoring MIB
Network Working Group S. WaldbusserRequest for Comments: 1513 Carnegie Mellon UniversityUpdates: 1271 September 1993 Token Ring Extensions to the Remote Network Monitoring MIBStatus of this Memo T...查看完整版>>RFC1513 - Token Ring Extensions to the Remote Network Monitoring MIB05.Report My Recent Situation to Those Who Care Me on the Forum
Report My Recent Situation to Those Who Care Me on the Forum —Also a reply to CharlesDear Charles, Congratulations to you for the new position first of all! I am lucky enough by chan...查看完整版>>Report My Recent Situation to Those Who Care Me on the Forum06.RFC1661 - The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)
Network Working Group W. Simpson, EditorRequest for Comments: 1661 DaydreamerSTD: 51 July 1994Obsoletes: 1548Category: Standards Track The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)Status of this Memo This doc...查看完整版>>RFC1661 - The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)07.RFC555 - Responses to critiques of the proposed mail protocol
Network Working Group James E. White (JEW)Request for Comments: 555 SRI-ARCNIC: 17993 July 27, 1973 Response to Critiques of the Proposed Mail Protocol A number of people have responded to my prop...查看完整版>>RFC555 - Responses to critiques of the proposed mail protocol08.RFC394 - Two Proposed Changes to the IMP-Host Protocol
Network Working Group John M. McQuillanRequest for Comments #394 Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc.NIC 11856 27 September 1972Categories: B.1Updates: RFC#381Obsoletes: TWO PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE IMP-HO...查看完整版>>RFC394 - Two Proposed Changes to the IMP-Host Protocol09.RFC966 - Host groups: A multicast extension to the Internet Protocol
Network Working Group S. E. DeeringRequest for Comments: 966 D. R. Cheriton Sta...查看完整版>>RFC966 - Host groups: A multicast extension to the Internet Protocol10.RFC1007 - Military supplement to the ISO Transport Protocol
Network Working Group Wayne McCoyRequest for Comments: 1007 June 1987 MILITARY SUPPLEMENT TO THE ISO TRANSPORT PROTOCOLStatus of this Memo This RFCis being distributed to members of the Internet c...查看完整版>>RFC1007 - Military supplement to the ISO Transport Protocol

 

 

免责声明：本文为网络用户发布，其观点仅代表作者个人观点，与本站无关，本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实，其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺，请读者仅作参考，并请自行核实相关内容。