Arbitration Law in America美国的仲裁法:评论评估
分类: 图书,进口原版书,人文社科 Non Fiction ,
作者: Edward Brunet,Richard E. Speidel,Jean E. Sternlight,Stephen H. Ware著
出 版 社:
出版时间: 2006-1-1字数:版次: 1页数: 394印刷时间: 2006/01/01开本: 16开印次: 1纸张: 胶版纸I S B N : 9780521839822包装: 精装内容简介
“This book does not function as a handbook or guide to the current state of the doctrine However,for those in the field who are thinking critically about the current structure of U。S。 arbitration law,the authors have done a fine job of assessing areas that require further study and presenting policy based normative propositions that can and should spark critical debate。”
Arguing that the 80 year-old Federal Arbitration Act badly needs major changes,the authors, who have previously written major articles on arbitration law and policy,set out their own views and argue among themselves about the necessary reforms of arbitration。The book contains draft legislation for use in international and domestic arbitration and detailed explanation of the precise justifications for proposed legislative changes。 It also contains two proposals that might be deemed radical to ban arbitration related to the purchase of products by consumers and to prohibit arbitration of employment disputes。 Each proposal is vetted fully and critiqued by one or more of the other co-authors。
目录
Acknowledgments page xxi
Introduction
1 The Core Values of Arbitration
Edward Brunet
Section 1.1 Party Autonomy: Allocating Disputing Power and Freedom to the Disputants
Section 1.2 Privatization: On Secrecy, Privacy, and Self-Governance
Section 1.3 Arbitrator Expertise: Substantive, Procedural, or Mythical
Section 1.4 Arbitrator Neutrality: Trust and the Relationship to Expertise
Section 1.5 The Adjudication Efficiency of Arbitration: Myth or Reality?
Section 1.6 Fairness: The Opportunity for a Fundamentally Fair Hearing
Section 1.7 Finality in Arbitration: A Core Value or a Default Rule
Section 1.8 The Public Dimension of Arbitration: The Limits of Privatization Policy
Section 1.9 Concluding Thoughts: Repackaging Arbitration Values through Trade-offs and the Paramount Value of Party Autonomy
2 Common Legal Issues in American Arbitration Law
Richard E. Speidel
Section 2.1 The Relationship between Arbitration Values and Arbitration Law
Section 2.2 What is Arbitration?
Section 2.3 Development and Scope of American Arbitration Law
2.3(1) Arbitration Theory
2.3(2) The Stages of American Arbitration Law
2.3(2)(A) Stage One: Arbitrability
2.3(2)(B) Stage Two: The Middle Ground
2.3(2)(C) Stage Three: Confirmation and Enforcement of the Award
Section 2.4 Interstate Arbitration: Chapter 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act
2.4(1) History
2.4(2) Stage One: Arbitrability
2.4(2)(A) Basic Provisions
2.4(2)(B) Notable Omissions
(1) Federal Jurisdiction
(2) Scope and Preemptive Effect
(3) Employment Contracts
(4) Grounds to Refuse Enforcement
(5) Power of Tribunal to Decide its Own Jurisdiction
(6) Separability
(7) Public Policy Exclusions: Is the Claim Capable of Arbitration?
(8) Mandatory v. Permissive Rules
2.4(3) Stage Two: The Middle Ground
2.4(4) Stage Three: Confirmation and Enforcement of the Award
Section 2.5 International Arbitration
2.5(1) History: The New York Convention
2.5(2) Stage One: Arbitrability
2.5(2)(A) Basic Provisions
2.5(2)(B) Issues and Omissions
(1) Federal Jurisdiction and Venue
(2) Enforcing the Agreement to Arbitrate
(3) Competence and Separability
(4) Capability
(5) Stay of Pending Litigation
(6) Mandatory Rules
2.5(3) Stage Two: The Middle Ground
2.5(4) Stage Three: Recognition and Enforcement of the Award
Section 2.6 Intrastate (State) Arbitration Law
2.6(1) History
2.6(2) Stage One: Arbitrability
2.6(2)(A) Mandatory Rules
2.6(2)(B) Arbitrability
2.6(3) Stage Two: The Middle Ground
2.6(4) Stage Three: Enforcing the Award
Section 2.7 A Note in Transition
3 The Appropriate Role of State Law in the Federal Arbitration System: Choice and Preemption
4 Interstate Arbitration: Chapter 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act
5 Consumer Arbitration
6 International Commercial Arbitration: Implementing the New York Convention
7 Tension Points: Where the Authors Disagree
Appendices
Index