RFC1860 - Variable Length Subnet Table For IPv4

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
宽屏版  字体: |||超大  

Network Working Group T. Pummill

Request for Comments: 1860 Alantec

Category: Informational B. Manning

ISI

October 1995

Variable Length Subnet Table For IPv4

Status of this Memo

This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo

does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of

this memo is unlimited.

Abstract

This document itemizes the potential values for IPv4 subnets.

Additional information is provided for Hex and Decmial values,

classfull equivalents, and number of addresses available within the

indicated block. We appreciate inputs from BrUCe Pinsky (cisco) and

Daniel Karrenberg (RIPE).

Table

The following table lists the variable length subnets from 1 to 32,

the CIDR representation form and the Decmial equivalents.

Mask value:

Hex CIDR Decimal #of add Classfull

80.00.00.00 /1 128.0.0.0 2048 M 128 A

C0.00.00.00 /2 192.0.0.0 1024 M 64 A

E0.00.00.00 /3 224.0.0.0 512 M 32 A

F0.00.00.00 /4 240.0.0.0 256 M 16 A

F8.00.00.00 /5 248.0.0.0 128 M 8 A

FC.00.00.00 /6 252.0.0.0 64 M 4 A

FE.00.00.00 /7 254.0.0.0 32 M 2 A

FF.00.00.00 /8 255.0.0.0 16 M 1 A

FF.80.00.00 /9 255.128.0.0 8 M 128 B

FF.C0.00.00 /10 255.192.0.0 4 M 64 B

FF.E0.00.00 /11 255.224.0.0 2 M 32 B

FF.F0.00.00 /12 255.240.0.0 1024 K 16 B

FF.F8.00.00 /13 255.248.0.0 512 K 8 B

FF.FC.00.00 /14 255.252.0.0 256 K 4 B

FF.FE.00.00 /15 255.254.0.0 128 K 2 B

FF.FF.00.00 /16 255.255.0.0 64 K 1 B

FF.FF.80.00 /17 255.255.128.0 32 K 128 C

FF.FF.C0.00 /18 255.255.192.0 16 K 64 C

FF.FF.E0.00 /19 255.255.224.0 8 K 32 C

FF.FF.F0.00 /20 255.255.240.0 4 K 16 C

FF.FF.F8.00 /21 255.255.248.0 2 K 8 C

FF.FF.FC.00 /22 255.255.252.0 1 K 4 C

FF.FF.FE.00 /23 255.255.254.0 512 2 C

FF.FF.FF.00 /24 255.255.255.0 256 1 C

FF.FF.FF.80 /25 255.255.255.128 128

FF.FF.FF.C0 /26 255.255.255.192 64

FF.FF.FF.E0 /27 255.255.255.224 32

FF.FF.FF.F0 /28 255.255.255.240 16

FF.FF.FF.F8 /29 255.255.255.248 8

FF.FF.FF.FC /30 255.255.255.252 4

FF.FF.FF.FE /31 255.255.255.254 This space is not usable

FF.FF.FF.FF /32 255.255.255.255 This is a single host route

Examples

The following tables illistrate some options for subnet/host partions

within selected block sizes.

From a /16 block

# bits Mask Effective Subnets Effective Hosts

======== ===== ================= ===============

2 255.255.192.0 2 16382

3 255.255.224.0 6 8190

4 255.255.240.0 14 4094

5 255.255.248.0 30 2046

6 255.255.252.0 62 1022

7 255.255.254.0 126 510

8 255.255.255.0 254 254

9 255.255.255.128 510 126

10 255.255.255.192 1022 62

11 255.255.255.224 2046 30

12 255.255.255.240 4094 14

13 255.255.255.248 8190 6

14 255.255.255.252 16382 2

From a /24 block

# bits Mask Effective Subnets Effective Hosts

======== ===== ================= ===============

2 255.255.255.192 2 62

3 255.255.255.224 6 30

4 255.255.255.240 14 14

5 255.255.255.248 30 6

6 255.255.255.252 62 2

*Subnet all zeroes and all ones excluded.

*Host all zeroes and all ones excluded.

References

[1] Fuller, V., Li, T., Yu, J., and K. Varadhan, "Classless Inter-

Domain Routing (CIDR): an Address Assignment and Aggregation

Strategy", RFC1519, BARRNet, cicso, Merit, OARnet, September

1993.

Security Considerations

Security issues are not discussed in this memo.

Authors' Addresses

Troy Pummill

EMail: trop@alantec.com

Bill Manning

Information Sciences Institute

University of Southern California

4676 Admiralty Way

Marina del Rey, CA 90292-6695

USA

Phone: +1 310-822-1511 x387

Fax: +1 310-823-6714

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
© 2005- 王朝网络 版权所有