王朝网络
分享
 
 
 

RFC1419 - SNMP over AppleTalk

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
宽屏版  字体: |||超大  

Network Working Group G. Minshall

Request for Comments: 1419 Novell, Inc.

M. Ritter

Apple Computer, Inc.

March 1993

SNMP over AppleTalk

Status of this Memo

This RFCspecifies an IAB standards track protocol for the Internet

community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.

Please refer to the current edition of the "IAB Official Protocol

Standards" for the standardization state and status of this protocol.

Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

IntrodUCtion

This memo describes the method by which the Simple Network Management

Protocol (SNMP) as specified in [1] can be used over AppleTalk

protocols [2] instead of the Internet UDP/IP protocol stack. This

specification is useful for network elements which have AppleTalk

support but lack TCP/IP support. It should be noted that if a

network element supports multiple protocol stacks, and UDP is

available, it is the preferred network layer to use.

SNMP has been successful in managing Internet capable network

elements which support the protocol stack at least through UDP, the

connectionless Internet transport layer protocol. As originally

designed, SNMP is capable of running over any reasonable transport

mechanism (not necessarily a transport protocol) that supports bi-

directional flow and addressability.

Many non-Internet capable network elements are present in networks.

Some of these elements are equipped with the AppleTalk protocols.

One method of using SNMP to manage these elements is to define a

method of transmitting an SNMP message inside an AppleTalk protocol

data unit.

This RFCis the product of the SNMP over a Multi-protocol Internet

Working Group of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).

1. Background

The AppleTalk equivalent of UDP (and IP) is DDP (Datagram Delivery

Protocol). The header field of a DDP datagram includes (at least

conceptually) source and destination network numbers, source and

destination node numbers, and source and destination socket numbers.

Additionally, DDP datagrams include a "protocol type" in the header

field which may be used to further demultiplex packets. The data

portion of a DDP datagram may contain from zero to 586 octets.

AppleTalk's Name Binding Protocol (NBP) is a distributed name-to-

address mapping protocol. NBP names are logically of the form

"object:type@zone", where "zone" is determined, loosely, by the

network on which the named entity resides; "type" is the kind of

entity being named; and "object" is any string which causes

"object:type@zone" to be unique in the AppleTalk internet.

Generally, "object" also helps an end-user determine which instance

of a specific type of service is being Accessed. NBP names are not

case sensitive. Each field of the NBP name ("object", "type", and

"zone") is limited to 32 octets. The octets usually consist of

human-readable ascii characters.

2. Specification

SNMP REQUESTS encapsulated according to this standard will be sent to

DDP socket number 8; they will contain a DDP protocol type of 8. The

data octets of the DDP datagram will be a standard SNMP message as

defined in [1].

SNMP RESPONSES encapsulated according to this standard will be sent

to the DDP socket number which originated the corresponding SNMP

request; they will contain a DDP protocol type of 8. The data octets

of the DDP datagram will be a standard SNMP message as defined in

[1]. (Note: as stated in [1], section 4.1, the *source* address of

a RESPONSE PDU will be the same as the *destination* address of the

corresponding REQUEST PDU.)

A network element which is capable of responding to SNMP REQUESTS

over AppleTalk must advertise this capability via the AppleTalk Name

Binding Protocol using an NBP type of "SNMP Agent" (hex 53, 4E, 4D,

50, 20, 41, 67, 65, 6E, 74).

A network management station which is capable of receiving an SNMP

TRAP must advertise this capability via the AppleTalk Name Binding

Protocol using an NBP type of "SNMP Trap Handler" (hex 53, 4E, 4D,

50, 20, 54, 72, 61, 70, 20, 48, 61, 6E, 64, 6C, 65, 72).

SNMP TRAPS encapsulated according to this standard will be sent to

DDP socket number 9; they will contain a DDP protocol type of 8. The

data octets of the DDP datagram will be a standard SNMP message as

defined in [1]. The agent-addr field of the Trap-PDU must be filled

with a NetworkAddress of all zeros (the unknown IP address). Thus, to

identify the trap sender, the name and value of the nbpObject and

nbpZone corresponding to the nbpEntry with the nbpType equal to "SNMP

Agent" should be included in the variable-bindings of any trap that

is sent [3].

The NBP name for both an agent and a trap handler should be stable -

it should not change any more often than the IP address of a typical

TCP/IP end system changes. It is suggested that the NBP name be

stored in some form of stable storage (PRAM, local disk, etc.).

3. Discussion of AppleTalk Addressing

3.1 Introduction

The AppleTalk protocol suite has certain features not manifest in the

standard TCP/IP suite. Its unique naming strategy and the dynamic

nature of address assignment can cause problems for SNMP management

stations that wish to manage AppleTalk networks. TCP/IP end nodes,

as of this writing, have an associated IP address which distinguishes

each from the other. AppleTalk end nodes, in general, have no such

characteristic. The network level address, while often relatively

stable, can change at every reboot (or more frequently).

Thus, a thrust of this proposal is that a "name" (as opposed to an

"address") for an end system be used as the identifying attribute.

This is the equivalent, when dealing with TCP/IP end nodes, of using

the domain name. While the mapping (DNS name, IP address) is more

stable than the mapping (NBP name, DDP address), the mapping (DNS

name, IP address) is not required to exist (e.g., hosts with no host

name, only an IP address). In contrast, all AppleTalk nodes that

implement this specification are required to respond to NBP lookups

and confirms (e.g., implement the NBP protocol stub), which

guarantees that the mapping (NBP name, DDP address) will exist.

In determining the SNMP name to register for an agent, it is

suggested that the SNMP name be a name which is associated with other

network services offered by the machine. On a Macintosh system, for

example, it is suggested that the system name (the "Macintosh Name"

for System 7.0 which is used to advertise file sharing, program-to-

program communication, and possibly other services) be used as the

"object" field of the NBP name. This name has AppleTalk

significance, and is tightly bound to the network's concept of a

given system's identity.

NBP lookups, which are used to turn NBP names into DDP addresses, can

cause large amounts of network traffic as well as consume CPU

resources. It is also the case that the ability to perform an NBP

lookup is sensitive to certain network disruptions (such as zone

table inconsistencies, etc.) which would not prevent direct AppleTalk

communications between a management station and an agent.

Thus, it is recommended that NBP lookups be used infrequently with

the primary purpose being to create a cache of name-to-address

mappings. These cached mappings should then be used for any further

SNMP requests. It is recommended that SNMP management stations

maintain this cache between reboots. This caching can help minimize

network traffic, reduce CPU load on the network, and allow for (some

amount of) network trouble shooting when the basic name-to-address

translation mechanism is broken.

3.2 How To Acquire NBP names:

A management station may have a pre-configured list of names of

agents to manage. A management station may allow for an interaction

with an operator in which a list of manageable agents is acquired

(via NBP) and presented for the operator to choose which agents

should be managed by that management station. Finally, a management

station may manage all manageable agents in a set of zones or

networks.

An agent must be configured with the name of a specific management

station or group of management stations before sending SNMP traps.

In the absence of any such configured information, an agent is NOT to

generate any SNMP traps. In particular, an agent is NEVER to

initiate a wildcard NBP lookup to find a management station to

receive a trap. All NBP lookups generated by an agent must be fully

specified. Note, however, that this does not apply to a

configuration utility that might be associated with such an agent.

Such a utility may well allow a user to navigate around the network

to select a management station or stations to receive SNMP traps from

the agent.

3.3 When To Turn NBP Names Into Addresses:

When SNMP agents or management stations use a cache entry to address

an SNMP packet, they should attempt to confirm the mapping if it

hasn't been confirmed in T1 seconds. This cache entry lifetime, T1,

has a minimum, default value of 60 seconds. This value should be

configurable.

A management station may decide to prime its cache of names prior to

actually sending any SNMP requests to any given agent. In general,

it is eXPected that a management station may want to keep certain

mappings "more current" than other mappings. In particular, those

nodes which represent the network infrastructure (routers, etc.) may

be deemed "more important" by the management station.

Note, however, that a long-running management station starting up and

reading a configuration file containing a number of NBP names should

not attempt to prime its cache all at once. It should, instead,

issue the resolutions over an extended period of time (perhaps in

some pre-determined or configured priority order). Each resolution

might, in fact, be a wildcard lookup in a given zone.

An agent should NEVER prime its cache. It should do NBP lookups (or

confirms) only when it needs to send an SNMP trap to a given

management station. An agent does not need to confirm a cache entry

to reply to a request.

3.4 How To Turn NBP Names Into Addresses:

If the only piece of information available is the NBP name, then an

NBP lookup should be performed to turn that name into a DDP address.

However, if there is a piece of stale information, it can be used as

a hint to perform an NBP confirm (which sends a unicast to the

network address which is presumed to be the target of the name

lookup) to see if the stale information is, in fact, still valid.

An NBP name to DDP address mapping can also be confirmed implicitly

using only SNMP transactions. If a management station is sending a

get-request, it can add a request, in the same packet, for the

destination's nbpObject and nbpZone corresponding to the nbpEntry

with the nbpType equal to "SNMP Agent" [3]. The source DDP address

can be gleaned from the reply and used with the nbpObject and nbpZone

returned to confirm the cache entry.

The above notwithstanding, for set-requests, there is a race

condition that can occur where an SNMP request may go to the wrong

agent (because the old node went down and a new node came up with the

same DDP address.) This is problematic becase the wrong agent might

generate a response packet that the management station could not

distinguish from a reply from the intended agent. In the future,

when SNMP security is implemented, each packet is authenticated at

the destination, and the reply should implicitly confirm the validity

of the cache entry used and prevent this race condition.

3.5 What if NBP is broken:

Under some circumstances, there may be connectivity between a

management station and an agent, but the NBP machinery required to

turn an NBP name into a DDP address may be broken. Examples of

failures which would cause this include: NBP FwdReq (forward NBP

lookup onto locally attached network) broken at a router on the

network containing the agent; NBP BrRq (NBP broadcast request)

mechanism broken at a router on the network containing the managment

station (because of a zone table mis-configuration, for example); or

NBP broken in the target node.

A management station which is dedicated to AppleTalk management might

choose to alleviate some of these failures by implementing the router

portion of NBP within the management station itself. For example,

the management station might already know all the zones on the

AppleTalk internet and the networks on which each zone appears.

Given an NBP lookup which fails, the management station could send an

NBP FwdReq to the network in which the agent was last located. If

that failed, the station could then send an NBP LkUp (an NBP lookup

packet) as a directed (DDP) multicast to each network number on that

network. Of the above (single) failures, this combined approach will

solve the case where either the local router's BrRq to NBP FwdReq

mechanism is broken or the remote router's NBP FwdReq to NBP LkUp

mechanism is broken.

4. Acknowledgements

Some of the boilerplate in this memo is copied from [4], [5], and

[6]. The Apple-IP Working Group was instrumental in defining this

document. Their support and work was greatly appreciated.

5. References

[1] Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M., and J. Davin, "A Simple

Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 15, RFC1157, SNMP

Research, Performance Systems International, Performance Systems

International, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, May 1990.

[2] Sidhu, G., Andrews, R., and A. Oppenheimer, "Inside AppleTalk

(Second Edition)", Addison-Wesley, 1990.

[3] Waldbusser, S., "AppleTalk Management Information Base", RFC

1243, Carnegie Mellon University, August 1991.

[4] Schoffstall, M., Davin, C., Fedor, M., and J. Case, "SNMP over

Ethernet", RFC1089, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, MIT

Laboratory for Computer Science, NYSERNet, Inc., University of

Tennessee at Knoxville, February 1989.

[5] Bostock, S., "SNMP over IPX", RFC1420, Novell, Inc., March 1993.

[6] Piscitello, D., "Guidelines for the Specification of Protocol

Support of the SNMP", Work in Progress.

6. Security Considerations

Security issues are discussed in section 3.4.

7. Authors' Addresses

Greg Minshall

Novell, Inc.

1340 Treat Blvd, ste. 500

Walnut Creek, CA 94596

Phone: 510 947-0998

Fax: 510 947-1238

EMail: minshall@wc.novell.com

Mike Ritter

Apple Computer, Inc.

10500 North De Anza Boulevard, MS: 35-K

Cupertino, California 95014

Phone: 408 862-8088

Fax: 408 862-1159

EMail: MWRITTER@applelink.apple.com

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
2023年上半年GDP全球前十五强
 百态   2023-10-24
美众议院议长启动对拜登的弹劾调查
 百态   2023-09-13
上海、济南、武汉等多地出现不明坠落物
 探索   2023-09-06
印度或要将国名改为“巴拉特”
 百态   2023-09-06
男子为女友送行,买票不登机被捕
 百态   2023-08-20
手机地震预警功能怎么开?
 干货   2023-08-06
女子4年卖2套房花700多万做美容:不但没变美脸,面部还出现变形
 百态   2023-08-04
住户一楼被水淹 还冲来8头猪
 百态   2023-07-31
女子体内爬出大量瓜子状活虫
 百态   2023-07-25
地球连续35年收到神秘规律性信号,网友:不要回答!
 探索   2023-07-21
全球镓价格本周大涨27%
 探索   2023-07-09
钱都流向了那些不缺钱的人,苦都留给了能吃苦的人
 探索   2023-07-02
倩女手游刀客魅者强控制(强混乱强眩晕强睡眠)和对应控制抗性的关系
 百态   2020-08-20
美国5月9日最新疫情:美国确诊人数突破131万
 百态   2020-05-09
荷兰政府宣布将集体辞职
 干货   2020-04-30
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案逍遥观:鹏程万里
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案神机营:射石饮羽
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案昆仑山:拔刀相助
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案天工阁:鬼斧神工
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案丝路古道:单枪匹马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:与虎谋皮
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:李代桃僵
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:指鹿为马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:小鸟依人
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:千金买邻
 干货   2019-11-12
 
>>返回首页<<
推荐阅读
 
 
频道精选
 
静静地坐在废墟上,四周的荒凉一望无际,忽然觉得,凄凉也很美
© 2005- 王朝网络 版权所有