王朝网络

分享

 

01.different between BPL and DLL
之前, 對BPL和DLL的區別, 一直是一知半解的狀態, 大部分的書(我看過的), 就算比較經典的delphi書, 也說得很含糊! 終于找到比較詳細的說明!!!That is correct. A BPL is a DLL. (But not all DLLs are BPLs.)> But...查看完整版>>different between BPL and DLL02.Delphi中的包（三）：bpl和dll
曾经听说过“bpl就是一种特殊的dll”，但是没有想到这句话具有这么大的意义。最近看到有人在属于某个dpk的Unit里面写export语句，觉得非常惊奇。但是遍查delphi的help，与export相关的都是library。今天看...查看完整版>>Delphi中的包（三）：bpl和dll 03.RFC3444 - On the Difference between Information Models and Data Models
Network Working Group A. PrasRequest for Comments: 3444 University of TwenteCategory: Informational J. Schoenwaelder University of Osnabrueck January 2003 On the Difference between Information Mod...查看完整版>>RFC3444 - On the Difference between Information Models and Data Models04.RFC2569 - Mapping between LPD and IPP Protocols
Network Working Group R. HerriotRequest For Comments: 2569 Xerox CorporationCategory: EXPerimental N. Jacobs Sun Microsystems, Inc. T. Hastings Xerox Corporation J. Martin Underscore, Inc. April 1...查看完整版>>RFC2569 - Mapping between LPD and IPP Protocols05.RFC2157 - Mapping between X.400 and RFC-822/MIME Message Bodies
Network Working Group H. AlvestrandRequest for Comments: 2157 UNINETTCategory: Standards Track January 1998 Mapping between X.400 and RFC-822/MIME Message BodiesStatus of this Memo This document s...查看完整版>>RFC2157 - Mapping between X.400 and RFC-822/MIME Message Bodies06.RFC2436 - Collaboration between ISOC/IETF and ITU-T
Network Working Group R. BrettRequest for Comments: 2436 Nortel NetworksCategory: Informational S. Bradner Harvard University G. Parsons Nortel Networks October 1998 Collaboration between ISOC/IET...查看完整版>>RFC2436 - Collaboration between ISOC/IETF and ITU-T07.RFC1401 - Correspondence between the IAB and DISA on the use of DNS
Network Working Group Internet Architecture BoardRequest for Comments: 1401 Lyman Chapin, Chair January 1993 Correspondence between the IAB and DISA on the use of DNS throughout the InternetStatus...查看完整版>>RFC1401 - Correspondence between the IAB and DISA on the use of DNS08.RFC1405 - Mapping between X.400(1984/1988) and Mail-11 (DECnet mail)
Network Working Group C. AllocchioRequest for Comments: 1405 I.N.F.N. - Italy January 1993 Mapping between X.400(1984/1988) and Mail-11 (DECnet mail)Status of this Memo This memo defines an EXPeri...查看完整版>>RFC1405 - Mapping between X.400(1984/1988) and Mail-11 (DECnet mail)09.RFC1495 - Mapping between X.400 and RFC-822 Message Bodies
Network Working Group H. AlvestrandRequest for Comments: 1495 SINTEF DELABUpdates: 1327 S. Kille ISODE Consortium R. Miles Soft*Switch, Inc. M. Rose Dover Beach Consulting, Inc. S. Thompson Soft*S...查看完整版>>RFC1495 - Mapping between X.400 and RFC-822 Message Bodies10.RFC1494 - Equivalences between 1988 X.400 and RFC-822 Message Bodies
Network Working Group H. AlvestrandRequest for Comments: 1494 SINTEF DELAB S. Thompson Soft*Switch, Inc. August 1993 Equivalences between 1988 X.400 and RFC-822 Message BodiesStatus of this Memo T...查看完整版>>RFC1494 - Equivalences between 1988 X.400 and RFC-822 Message Bodies

 

 

免责声明：本文为网络用户发布，其观点仅代表作者个人观点，与本站无关，本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实，其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺，请读者仅作参考，并请自行核实相关内容。