王朝网络

分享

 

01.@@FETCH_STATUS
@@FETCH_STATUS @@FETCH_STATUS @@FETCH_STATUS返回被 FETCH 语句执行的最后游标的状态，而不是任何当前被连接打开的游标的状态。返回值描述0FETCH 语句成功。-1FETCH 语句失败或此行不在结果集中。-2被提取...查看完整版>>@@FETCH_STATUS02.@@FETCH_STATUS
@@FETCH_STATUS返回被 FETCH 语句执行的最后游标的状态，而不是任何当前被连接打开的游标的状态。返回值描述0FETCH 语句成功。-1FETCH 语句失败或此行不在结果集中。-2被提取的行不存在。语法@@FETCH_STATUS返回类型...查看完整版>>@@FETCH_STATUS03.理解 oracle 的 “lsnrctl status”
先看看 lsnrctl status 的输出信息： Services Summary... Service "PLSExtProc" has 1 instance(s). Instance "PLSExtProc", status UNKNOWN, has 1 handler(s) for this ...查看完整版>>理解 oracle 的 “lsnrctl status”04.RFC3463 - Enhanced Mail System Status Codes
Network Working Group G. VaudreuilRequest for Comments: 3463 LUCent TechnologiesObsoletes: 1893 January 2003Category: Standards Track Enhanced Mail System Status CodesStatus of this Memo This docu...查看完整版>>RFC3463 - Enhanced Mail System Status Codes05.RFC3166 - Request to Move RFC1403 to Historic Status
Network Working Group D. MeyerRequest for Comments: 3166 SprintCategory: Informational J. Scudder Cisco Systems August 2001 Request to Move RFC1403 to Historic StatusStatus of this Memo This memo ...查看完整版>>RFC3166 - Request to Move RFC1403 to Historic Status06.RFC3167 - Request to Move RFC1745 to Historic Status
Network Working Group D. MeyerRequest for Comments: 3167 SprintCategory: Informational J. Scudder Cisco Systems August 2001 Request to Move RFC1745 to Historic StatusStatus of this Memo This memo ...查看完整版>>RFC3167 - Request to Move RFC1745 to Historic Status07.RFC3109 - Request to Move STD 39 to Historic Status
Network Working Group R. BradenRequest for Comments: 3109 ISICategory: Informational R. Bush RGnet J. Klensin AT&T May 2001 Request to Move STD 39 to Historic StatusStatus of this Memo This me...查看完整版>>RFC3109 - Request to Move STD 39 to Historic Status08.RFC3090 - DNS Security Extension Clarification on Zone Status
Network Working Group E. LewisRequest for Comments: 3090 NAI LabsCategory: Standards Track March 2001 DNS Security Extension Clarification on Zone StatusStatus of this Memo This document specifies...查看完整版>>RFC3090 - DNS Security Extension Clarification on Zone Status09.RFC1923 - RIPv1 Applicability Statement for Historic Status
Network Working Group J. HalpernRequest for Comments: 1923 Newbridge NetworksCategory: Informational S. Bradner Harvard University March 1996 RIPv1 Applicability Statement for Historic StatusStatu...查看完整版>>RFC1923 - RIPv1 Applicability Statement for Historic Status10.RFC1891 - SMTP Service Extension for Delivery Status Notifications
Network Working Group K. MooreRequest for Comments: 1891 University of TennesseeCategory: Standards Track January 1996 SMTP Service Extension for Delivery Status NotificationsStatus of this Memo T...查看完整版>>RFC1891 - SMTP Service Extension for Delivery Status Notifications

 

 

免责声明：本文为网络用户发布，其观点仅代表作者个人观点，与本站无关，本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实，其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺，请读者仅作参考，并请自行核实相关内容。