作为四个内部类型转换操作符之一的dynamic_cast和传统的C风格的强制类型转换有着巨大的差别。除了dynamic_cast以外的转换,其行为的都是在编译期就得以确定的,转换是否成功,并不依赖被转
Network Working Group J. Altman Request for Comments: 2950 Columbia University Category: Standards T
STATIC_CAST VERSUS REINTERPRET_CAST static_cast 和 reinterpret_cast 操作符修改了操作数类型. 它们不是互逆的; static_cas
看了凌杰的文章(),也想补充两句。lexical_cast比起stringstream来说,的确不一定简洁,当然,其语义和可读性都有提高,但同时也失之灵活。例如下面的情况,似乎就无法用lexical_
一、必要性 随着近年来数据库技术的深入发展,以Unix平台为代表的Informix Dynamic Server和以NT平台为代表的MS SQL Server得到了广泛的应用。在一个公共的环境
Network Working Group C. Adams Request for Comments: 2984 Entrust Technologies Category: Standards
Network Working Group C. Adams Request for Comments: 2612 J. Gilchrist Category: Informational Ent
Network Working Group P. Vixie, Editor Request for Comments: 2136 ISC Updates: 1035 S. Thomson Cat
Network Working Group C. Adams Request for Comments: 2144 Entrust Technologies Category: Informati
Network Working Group R. Droms Request for Comments: 2131 BUCknell University Obsoletes: 1541 Marc