Network Working Group IAB Request for Comments: 2804 IESG Category: Informational May 2000 IETF P
Network Working Group H. Alvestrand Request for Comments: 2277 UNINETT BCP: 18 January 1998 Catego
Network Working Group R. Blane Request for Comments: 3026 ITU Category: Informational January 2001
Network Working Group G. Huston, Ed. Request for Comments: 3975
Network Working Group R. Austein, Ed. Request for Comments: 4071
Network Working Group L. Daigle, Ed. Request for Comments: 4052
Network Working Group P. Hoffman Request for Comments: 3536 IMC & VPNC Category: Informational
Network Working Group S. Bradner Request for Comments: 3131 Harvard University Category: Informati
2009年6月30日 — 经过IETF严格的审核与测试,近日华为赛门铁克的防火墙等安全产品凭借完美的表现,100%通过了IPv6 Ready所有测试项目,在众多国内网络安全产品中脱颖而出,率先通过
而IETF所面临的问题是,尽管IPv4与IPv6有某种家族相似性,但是二者之间还是有本质区别的:IPv4使用的是32位地址,而IPv6使用的则是128位地址。那么你怎样才能使你的仅有IPv4地址的