王朝网络

分享

 

01.RFC2429 - RTP Payload Format for the 1998 Version of ITU-T Rec
Network Working GroupRequest for Comments: 2429 C. BormannCategory: Standards Track Univ. Bremen L. Cline G. Deisher T. Gardos C. Maciocco D. Newell Intel J. Ott Univ. Bremen G. Sullivan PictureTe...查看完整版>>RFC2429 - RTP Payload Format for the 1998 Version of ITU-T Rec02.RFC2736 - Guidelines for Writers of RTP Payload Format Specifications
Network Working Group M. HandleyRequest for Comments: 2736 ACIRIBCP: 36 C. PerkinsCategory: Best Current Practice UCL December 1999 Guidelines for Writers of RTP Payload Format SpecificationsStatu...查看完整版>>RFC2736 - Guidelines for Writers of RTP Payload Format Specifications03.RFC2250 - RTP Payload Format for MPEG1/MPEG2 Video
Network Working Group D. HoffmanRequest for Comments: 2250 G. FernandoObsoletes: 2038 Sun Microsystems, Inc.Category: Standards Track V. Goyal Precept Software, Inc. M. Civanlar AT&T Labs - Re...查看完整版>>RFC2250 - RTP Payload Format for MPEG1/MPEG2 Video04.RFC2733 - An RTP Payload Format for Generic Forward Error Correction
Network Working Group J. RosenbergRequest for Comments: 2733 dynamicsoftCategory: Standards Track H. Schulzrinne Columbia University December 1999 An RTP Payload Format for Generic Forward Error C...查看完整版>>RFC2733 - An RTP Payload Format for Generic Forward Error Correction05.RFC2038 - RTP Payload Format for MPEG1/MPEG2 Video
Network Working Group D. HoffmanRequest for Comments: 2038 G. FernandoCategory: Standards Track Sun Microsystems, Inc. V. Goyal Precept Software, Inc. October 1996 RTP Payload Format for MPEG1/MPE...查看完整版>>RFC2038 - RTP Payload Format for MPEG1/MPEG2 Video06.RFC3555 - MIME Type Registration of RTP Payload Formats
Network Working Group S. CasnerRequest for Comments: 3555 Packet DesignCategory: Standards Track P. Hoschka W3C/INRIA/MIT July 2003 MIME Type Registration of RTP Payload FormatsStatus of this Memo...查看完整版>>RFC3555 - MIME Type Registration of RTP Payload Formats07.RFC1151 - Version 2 of the Reliable Data Protocol (RDP)
Network Working Group C. PartridgeRequest for Comments: 1151 BBN Systems and TechnologiesUpdates: RFC908 R. Hinden BBN Communications Corp. April 1990 Version 2 of the Reliable Data Protocol (RDP)...查看完整版>>RFC1151 - Version 2 of the Reliable Data Protocol (RDP)08.RFC644 - On the problem of signature authentication for network mail
Network Working Group Bob ThomasRequest for Comments: 644 BBN-TENEX Jul 1974 On the Problem of Signature Authentication for Network MailThis note describes the problem of signature authentication ...查看完整版>>RFC644 - On the problem of signature authentication for network mail09.About the pictures of paintings that Jenny posted for me....
Dear friends,I'm not able to post pictures on the forum. Jenny has excellent equipment andknow-how, so I occasionally ask her to post them for me.In this case of all of those huge murals, such as the...查看完整版>>About the pictures of paintings that Jenny posted for me....10.RFC3047 - RTP Payload Format for ITU-T Recommendation G.722.1
Network Working Group P. LuthiRequest for Comments: 3047 PictureTelCategory: Standards Track January 2001 RTP Payload Format for ITU-T Recommendation G.722.1Status of this Memo This document speci...查看完整版>>RFC3047 - RTP Payload Format for ITU-T Recommendation G.722.1

 

 

免责声明：本文为网络用户发布，其观点仅代表作者个人观点，与本站无关，本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实，其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺，请读者仅作参考，并请自行核实相关内容。