王朝网络

分享

 

01.RFC2370 - The OSPF Opaque LSA Option
Network Working Group R. ColtunRequest for Comments: 2370 FORE SystemsSee Also: 2328 July 1998Category: Standards Track The OSPF Opaque LSA OptionStatus of this Memo This document specifies an Int...查看完整版>>RFC2370 - The OSPF Opaque LSA Option02.RFC1587 - The OSPF NSSA Option
Network Working Group R. ColtunRequest for Comments: 1587 RainbowBridge CommunicationsCategory: Standards Track V. Fuller Stanford University March 1994 The OSPF NSSA OptionStatus of this Memo Thi...查看完整版>>RFC1587 - The OSPF NSSA Option03.RFC3101 - The OSPF Not-So-Stubby Area (NSSA) Option
Network Working Group P. MurphyRequest for Comments: 3101 US Geological SurveyObsoletes: 1587 January 2003Category: Standards Track The OSPF Not-So-Stubby Area (NSSA) OptionStatus of this Memo Thi...查看完整版>>RFC3101 - The OSPF Not-So-Stubby Area (NSSA) Option04.RFC2485 - DHCP Option for The Open Groups User Authentication Protocol
Network Working Group S. DrachRequest for Comments: 2485 Sun MicrosystemsCategory: Standards Track January 1999 DHCP Option for The Open Group's User Authentication ProtocolStatus of this Memo Thi...查看完整版>>RFC2485 - DHCP Option for The Open Groups User Authentication Protocol05.阻止OSPF LSA扩散
缺省时，OSPF在同一区域的所有接口上扩散新的LSA，除了有LSA到达的接口之外。有些冗余是需要的，因此它能保证扩散。但是太多的冗余会浪费带宽并可能由于过份连接及在一定拓朴结构中使用CPU使网络不稳定。示例应该与拓...查看完整版>>阻止OSPF LSA扩散06.RFC3011 - The IPv4 Subnet Selection Option for DHCP
Network Working Group G. WatersRequest for Comments: 3011 Nortel NetworksCategory: Standards Track November 2000 The IPv4 Subnet Selection Option for DHCPStatus of this Memo This document specifie...查看完整版>>RFC3011 - The IPv4 Subnet Selection Option for DHCP07.RFC3004 - The User Class Option for DHCP
Network Working Group G. StumpRequest for Comments: 3004 IBMCategory: Standards Track R. Droms Cisco Systems Y. Gu R. Vyaghrapuri A. Demirtjis Microsoft B. Beser Pacific Broadband Communications J...查看完整版>>RFC3004 - The User Class Option for DHCP08.RFC2385 - Protection of BGP Sessions via the TCP MD5 Signature Option
Network Working Group A. HeffernanRequest for Comments: 2385 cisco SystemsCategory: Standards Track August 1998 Protection of BGP Sessions via the TCP MD5 Signature OptionStatus of this Memo This ...查看完整版>>RFC2385 - Protection of BGP Sessions via the TCP MD5 Signature Option09.RFC2937 - The Name Service Search Option for DHCP
Network Working Group C. SmithRequest for Comments: 2937 Sun Microsystems, Inc.Category: Standards Track September 2000 The Name Service Search Option for DHCPStatus of this Memo This document specifi...查看完整版>>RFC2937 - The Name Service Search Option for DHCP10.RFC563 - Comments on the RCTE Telnet option
Network Working Group J. DavidsonRequest for Comments: 563 University of HawaiiNIC: 18775 28 August 1973References: RFC357, RFC560 Comments on the RCTE TELNET Option RFC560 describes a Remote Cont...查看完整版>>RFC563 - Comments on the RCTE Telnet option

 

 

免责声明：本文为网络用户发布，其观点仅代表作者个人观点，与本站无关，本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实，其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺，请读者仅作参考，并请自行核实相关内容。