王朝网络

分享

 

01.RFC210 - Improvement of Flow Control
Request for Comments # 210 W. ConradCategories C.4 HarvardNIC 7189 16 August 71 Improvement of Flow ControlThe current "give back" - "return" scheme seems to put the cart beforethe horse in that t...查看完整版>>RFC210 - Improvement of Flow Control02.Guru of the Week 条款12：控制流（Control Flow）
GotW #12 Control Flow著者：Herb Sutter 翻译：kingofark[声明]：本文内容取自www.gotw.ca网站上的Guru of the Week栏目，其著作权归原著者本人所有。译者kingofark在未经原著者本人同意的情况下翻译本文。本翻...查看完整版>>Guru of the Week 条款12：控制流（Control Flow）03.RFC1372 - Telnet Remote Flow Control Option
Network Working Group C. HedrickRequest for Comments: 1372 Rutgers UniversityObsoletes: RFC1080 D. Borman Cray Research, Inc. October 1992 Telnet Remote Flow Control OptionStatus of This Memo This...查看完整版>>RFC1372 - Telnet Remote Flow Control Option04.RFC1080 - Telnet remote flow control option
Network Working Group C. HedrickRequest for Comments: 1080 Rutgers University November 1988 Telnet Remote Flow Control OptionStatus of This Memo This RFCspecifies a standard for the Internet commu...查看完整版>>RFC1080 - Telnet remote flow control option05.RFC789 - Vulnerabilities of network control protocols: An example
RFC789 Vulnerabilities of Network Control Protocols: An Example Eric C. Rosen Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc.RFC789 Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc. Eric C. Rosen This paper has appeared in the January 1981 ...查看完整版>>RFC789 - Vulnerabilities of network control protocols: An example06.RFC721 - Out-of-Band Control Signals in a Host-to-Host Protocol
NWG/RFC721 1 SEP 76 LLG 36636Out-of-Band Control SignalsNetwork Working Group Larry GarlickRequest for Comments 721 SRI-ARCNIC 36636 1 September 76 Out-of-Band Control Signals in a Host-to-Host Pr...查看完整版>>RFC721 - Out-of-Band Control Signals in a Host-to-Host Protocol07.the difference between ClientID and ID of web control
Basically, The ID of web control should be used on serverprogramming, and the ClientID should be used on Client, pretty basic.if you want to use the ID of web control on Client, you will find itdoesn'...查看完整版>>the difference between ClientID and ID of web control08.RFC442 - Current flow-control scheme for IMPSYS
Network Working Group V. CerfRequest for Comments: 442 24 January 1973NIC: 13774 The Current Flow-Control Scheme for IMPSYS BB&N quarterly report #13 outlines part of the current flow control ...查看完整版>>RFC442 - Current flow-control scheme for IMPSYS09.RFC449 - Current flow-control scheme for IMPSYS
Network Working Group Dave WaldenRFC# 449 BBN-NETNIC # 14133 Jan. 6, 1973Updates RFC442 The Current Flow-control Scheme for IMPSYS. While Vint's notes on IMPSYS flow-control from the March 16, 197...查看完整版>>RFC449 - Current flow-control scheme for IMPSYS10.RFC59 - Flow Control - Fixed Versus Demand Allocation
The method of flow control described in RFC54, prior allocation ofbuffer space by the use of ALL network commands, has one particularadvantage. If no more than 100% of an NCP's buffer space is all...查看完整版>>RFC59 - Flow Control - Fixed Versus Demand Allocation

 

 

免责声明：本文为网络用户发布，其观点仅代表作者个人观点，与本站无关，本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实，其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺，请读者仅作参考，并请自行核实相关内容。