王朝网络

分享

 

01.RFC148 - Comments on RFC123
Network Working Group A. BhushanRequest for Comments # 148 MIT -- Project MACNIC # 6751 7 May 1971Categories: D.1 Comments on RFC#123 -------------------- The requirement that byte size 's' be 32-...查看完整版>>RFC148 - Comments on RFC12302.RFC127 - Comments on RFC123
Network Working Group J. PostelRequest for Comments # 127 20 April 71NIC #5843 UCLA[Category D.1 Computer ScienceUpdates 123] Comments on RFC123The following is my interpretation of the exchange b...查看完整版>>RFC127 - Comments on RFC12303.RFC393 - Comments on Telnet Protocol Changes
Network Working GroupRequest for Comments: 393 Joel M. WinettNIC 11585 Lincoln LaboratoryCategories: TELNET LL-67References: RFC109, 139, 158,318, and 328 3 October 1972 Comments on TELNET Protoco...查看完整版>>RFC393 - Comments on Telnet Protocol Changes04.RFC563 - Comments on the RCTE Telnet option
Network Working Group J. DavidsonRequest for Comments: 563 University of HawaiiNIC: 18775 28 August 1973References: RFC357, RFC560 Comments on the RCTE TELNET Option RFC560 describes a Remote Cont...查看完整版>>RFC563 - Comments on the RCTE Telnet option05.RFC1018 - Some comments on SQuID
Request for Comments: 1018 BBN Labs August 1987 Some Comments on SQuIDStatus of this Memo This memo is a discussion of some of the ideas eXPressed in RFC-1016 on Source Quench. This memo introdUCe...查看完整版>>RFC1018 - Some comments on SQuID06.RFC624 - Comments on the File Transfer Protocol
Network Working Group Mark Krilanovich (UCSB)Request for Comments: 624 George Gregg (UCSB)NIC #22054 Wayne Hathaway (AMES-67)references: RFC542 Jim White (SRI-ARC)obsoletes: RFC607 Feb 1974 Commen...查看完整版>>RFC624 - Comments on the File Transfer Protocol07.RFC582 - Comments on RFC580: Machine readable protocols
Network Working Group R. ClementsRequest for Comments: 582 BBN-TENEXNIC: 19962 5 November 1973 Comments on RFC580 - Machine Readable Protocols I fully support the requirement for machine-readable ...查看完整版>>RFC582 - Comments on RFC580: Machine readable protocols08.RFC175 - Comments on Socket Conventions Reconsidered
Network Working Group 11 June 1971Request for Comments: 175 E. Harslem - RandNIC 7074 J. Heafner - Rand Comments on "Socket Conventions Reconsidered" --------------------------------------------- ...查看完整版>>RFC175 - Comments on Socket Conventions Reconsidered09.RFC129 - Request for comments on socket name structure
Network Working Group 22 April 1971Request for Comments: 129 E. E. Harslem-RandNIC 5845 J. F. Heafner-Rand E. Meyer-MIT A REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ON SOCKET NAME STRUCTUREINTRODUCTION This RFCis in an...查看完整版>>RFC129 - Request for comments on socket name structure10.RFC47 - BBNs Comments on NWG/RFC#33
Network Working GroupRequest for Comments #47 J. Postel S. Crocker UCLA 20 April 70 BBN's Comments on NWG/RFC#33BBN has given us the attached comments on NWG/RFC33, but wouldn'tpublish them being ...查看完整版>>RFC47 - BBNs Comments on NWG/RFC#33

 

 

免责声明：本文为网络用户发布，其观点仅代表作者个人观点，与本站无关，本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实，其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺，请读者仅作参考，并请自行核实相关内容。