RFC73 - Response to NWG/RFC67

来源:王朝搜索
 
RFC73 - Response to NWG/RFC67

Network Working Group S. Crocker Request for Comments #73 UCLA 25 Sept. 70 Response to NWM/RFC#6

RFC135 - Response to NWG/RFC110

Network Working Group W. Hathaway Request for Comments: 135 AMES NIC: 6712 29 April 1971 Updates:

RFC355 - Response to NWG/RFC346

Network Working Group John Davidson Request for Comments #355 UH-ALOHA SYSTEM NIC # 10597 9 June 7

RFC131 - Response to RFC116: May NWG meeting

Network Working Group E. Harslem - Rand Request For Comments: 131 J. Heafner - Rand April 1971 R

RFC67 - Proposed Change to Host/IMP Spec to Eliminate Marking

Network Working Group S. Crocker Request for Comments #66 UCLA 26 August 70 3rd Level Ideas and

RFC613 - Network connectivity: A response to RFC603

Network Working Group Alex McKenzie RFC# 613 BBN-NET NIC # 21525 January 21, 1974 Network connect

RFC568 - Response to RFC567 - cross country network bandwidth

Received at NIC 21-Sept-73 Network Working Group J. McQuillan RFC#568 BBN-NET NIC #18971 18 Septem

RFC492 - Response to RFC467

Network Working Group E. Meyer Request for Comments: 492 MIT-Multics NIC: 15357 18 April 1973 RES

RFC29 - Response to RFC28

Network Working Group Robert Kahn RFC-29 BBN 19 January 1970 This note is in response to Bill Eng

响应 NWG/RFC67

Bill的建议确实不错;不过,我现在的政策是鼓励迅速的实施一号文献中的协议,而他有关改动的建议需要延后.对于我来说最重要的是,在对不是急需改变的协议改变之前,通过对网络的使用获得经验.(我在几个站点对

 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
© 2005- 王朝网络 版权所有